Skip to content
  • Shop
    • AirSpot Products
    • Supported Products
  • App
  • Map
  • Resources
    • About Us
    • Open Source AirSpot
    • AirSpot Device Instruction Manual
    • AirSpot Device Reviews
    • AirSpot Device Affiliates
    • AirSpot Library Lending
    • Support AirSpot
    • News
    • BreatheSafeAir Forum
    • AirSpot Elite Sport
    • ICAAN
    • Contact
Log in
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Vimeo
Airspothealth
  • Shop
    • AirSpot Products
    • Supported Products
  • App
  • Map
  • Resources
    • About Us
    • Open Source AirSpot
    • AirSpot Device Instruction Manual
    • AirSpot Device Reviews
    • AirSpot Device Affiliates
    • AirSpot Library Lending
    • Support AirSpot
    • News
    • BreatheSafeAir Forum
    • AirSpot Elite Sport
    • ICAAN
    • Contact
Log in Cart

Item added to your cart

Transmission of infectious diseases based on close contact

Transmission of infectious diseases based on close contact

Links
07/14/2025 4:43am 2 minute read

Listen to article
Audio generated by DropInBlog's Blog Voice AI™ may have slight pronunciation nuances. Learn more

Transmission of respiratory infectious diseases based on real close contact behaviour in an emergency room

The risk of transmission of respiratory infectious diseases in emergency rooms is high, posing a severe threat to the health of healthcare workers (HCWs).

Methods

The study was conducted in an emergency room of a medical school at a university in Hong Kong during a clinical skills competition. A total of 19,246 s of video surveillance data were collected, recording the treatment of three types of patients (P1: infusion patient, P2: critically ill patient, P3: agitated patient). Taking coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an example, a multi-route transmission model was established to assess the infection risk for HCWs and the effectiveness of various interventions.

Results

The average distances between HCWs and patients during the treatment of P1, P2, and P3 were 0.8 (25–75 percentile: 0.6, 1.1) m, 1.0 (0.8, 1.2) m, and 0.5 (0.4, 0.7) m, respectively. When treating P2, due to intubation procedures, the hourly risk of infection was highest at 43.4 % if no HCWs wore masks, which was 5.1 and 3.1 times higher than it during treatment of P1 (8.5 %) and P3 (13.9 %), respectively. During the treatment, without mask protection, the average hourly infection risk for nurses was 11.0 % (P1), 41.2 % (P2), and 16.8 % (P3), which was 1.8 times (P1), 0.9 times (P2), and 1.5 times (P3) that of doctors. If HCWs wear N95 respirators and surgical masks throughout, the total infection risk can be reduced by 94.7 % and 53.9 %, respectively. Increasing the ventilation rate from 1 ACH to 6 ACH reduced the infection risk through long-range airborne transmission by 43.8 % (P1), 36.1 % (P2), and 31.6 % (P3), with a total infection risk reduction of 2.4 % (P1), 5.6 % (P2), and 1.6 % (P3), respectively.

Conclusions

The findings of the study provide a scientific support for the precise prevention and control of respiratory infectious diseases under different treatments in emergency rooms.


For more information click on this link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468042725000636




« Back to Blog

Related Articles

Covid for Doctors - Dr Nancy Malek

Covid for Doctors - Dr Nancy Malek

1 minute read

07/14/2025 3:36am

Why

Why I Still Wear an N95: A Doctor’s Perspective

3 minute read

07/17/2025 9:33pm

Still Masked, Still Right: A Data-Driven Case for Vigilance

Still Masked, Still Right: A Data-Driven Case for Vigilance

2 minute read

07/17/2025 7:54pm

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Shipping Policy
  • Return and Refund Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Vimeo
© 2026, Airspothealth
  • Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
  • Opens in a new window.